The Erosion Control Blogs

The Blogger

Janice Kaspersen Janice Kaspersen Erosion Control Editor

More from this blogger

  1. A Large-Scale DIY Project
  2. Reconfiguring the Beach
  3. A Tiny Impediment to Shoreline Revetment
  4. Tougher Laws for Hillside Development
  5. Putting It All Back
  6. Building Beaches
  7. Moving Mountains
  8. Federal Standards for Florida A Precedent
  9. We Can't Even Go Back There
  10. What to Do About the Asian Carp
  11. Take a Few Minutes to Fill Out This Survey
  12. Lines in the Sand, Again
  13. Explaining What We Do
  14. EPA Issues Final Construction Site Guidelines
  15. Solving a Water Mystery in Bangladesh
  16. El Salvador Mudslides
  17. Trouble at Smuggler's Gulch
  18. Mud Follows Fire
  19. All Downhill From Here
  20. Support for Removing Dams
  21. LID Competition
  22. Finding Promise in Sediment
  23. StormCon 2010 Call for Papers
  24. More Stringent Mining Reviews
  25. Addressing Compost Questions
  26. Im Insulted
  27. Debating the Salt Cedar Beetle
  28. Join Us at StormCon '09 in Anaheim
  29. Tapping Opportunities
  30. Deforestation
  31. The World in a Grain of Sand
  32. Green Jobs Our Jobs
  33. The Price of Perfection
  34. A Year Later, It's Still Not Over
  35. Teaching Erosion Control
  36. The New Natural
  37. Recognizing Wetlands
  38. The Creek Is Closer Than You Think
  39. Sleight of Plan
  40. Fire Season Planning for What Comes Next
  41. Pulling the Plug on the Great Lakes
  42. Stimulus Money for Flood Control
  43. High-Speed Erosion
  44. StormCon Program Now Online
  45. Of Nutria and Men
  46. Energy versus the Environment
  47. Fire for Soil
  48. Biofuels vs Erosion Prevention
  49. Volunteer Labor
  50. Background Turbidity
  51. More on the Proposed ELG
  52. Debating the Cost of Effluent Limitations Guidelines
  53. Underwater
  54. Private Property, Public Funds
  55. All the Pages, None of the Trees
  56. Lines in the Sand
  57. Take a Look at What We've Added
  58. Cleaning Up in Tennessee
  59. Happy Holidays From Erosion Control
  60. Certification, Anyone
  61. Investing in the Infrastructure
  62. A River Runs Through It
  63. EPA's Proposed Effluent Limitation Guidelines Are Here
  64. Thank You, Firefighters
  65. Restoration Writ Large
  66. Between a Wall and a Hard Place
  67. Another Tool for Restoration
  68. StormCon Abstract Deadline Is Five Weeks Away
  69. A Change to Construction Permitting Not Yet, But Hold On
  70. The LEEDing Edge
  71. The Seed Dilemma
  72. An Overzealous Cleaning
  73. The State of the Infrastructure
  74. StormCon 2009 Call for Papers
  75. Effluent Guidelines for Construction Sites
  76. Assessing Risks After Gustav
  77. Where There Was Smoke, There Will Be Flooding
  78. Looking for Data on BMP Performance
  79. More Than Just the Articles
view all

EC Editor's Blog

June 30, 2009 6:54am PST

In Default

Posted By Janice Kaspersen 1 Comment

It’s a story that’s playing out all over the country: a housing development is on hold or even abandoned, with much of the work unfinished, including the erosion control measures.

An article from the Charlotte Observer documents a growing trend: bond defaults. Mecklenburg County in North Carolina has recently had 30 defaults on bonds worth more than two and a half million dollars.

Bonds are required in many cities to guarantee that public improvements necessary to accommodate the development will be completed: streets, sidewalks, storm drains, curbs and gutters, and various utilities. The bonds generally must be in place before construction permits are issued. If the developer defaults, the bond money is used to complete the infrastructure work. But defaults have been rare—until recently.

In addition to the unfinished sidewalks, unpaved streets, and other problems in many subdivisions, erosion and sediment control measures are often not in place, or, if they are, they’re not being maintained. If the bond isn’t enough to cover all the work that needs to be done, the city or county often has to take on the work.

How serious is the problem in your area? Are you seeing “on-hold” building sites with missing or inadequate erosion and sediment control BMPs?

What Do You Think?

Post a Comment

brambow

July 1st, 2009 5:27 AM PT

This is a big problem in the metro Atlanta area currently. We also have trouble determining who exactly is responsible for a property during the limbo period around foreclosures - former owners are more than willing to go ahead an say banks are responsible but the banks are not quick to accept that responsibility.

Post a Comment

Not a subscriber? Sign Up
 
 
*  
 




 

Get Erosion Control E-mail Updates!

Get weekly news and updates through our Erosion Control e-mail newsletter!