The Erosion Control Blogs

The Blogger

Janice Kaspersen Janice Kaspersen Erosion Control Editor

More from this blogger

  1. Ninety-Eight Percent Gone
  2. Two Weeks to StormCon
  3. Fighting Invasive Species of Another Sort
  4. Sacrificial Filtering
  5. China Landslides
  6. No Compensation for Beachfront Owners
  7. Sand and Oil
  8. Assessing the Effects of Oil
  9. Certifiable
  10. Clues in Sediment - and Oysters
  11. Tracking the Spill
  12. Louisiana's Wetlands
  13. Nobody's Home
  14. Saving Hitchcock Woods
  15. Dredging Up the Past
  16. Landslides
  17. Extreme Measures to Stop Flooding
  18. East Coast Flooding
  19. Well Done, Fargo
  20. Urban Logging
  21. A Large-Scale DIY Project
  22. Reconfiguring the Beach
  23. A Tiny Impediment to Shoreline Revetment
  24. Tougher Laws for Hillside Development
  25. Building Beaches
  26. Moving Mountains
  27. Federal Standards for Florida A Precedent
  28. We Can't Even Go Back There
  29. What to Do About the Asian Carp
  30. Take a Few Minutes to Fill Out This Survey
  31. Lines in the Sand, Again
  32. Explaining What We Do
  33. EPA Issues Final Construction Site Guidelines
  34. Solving a Water Mystery in Bangladesh
  35. El Salvador Mudslides
  36. Trouble at Smuggler's Gulch
  37. Mud Follows Fire
  38. All Downhill From Here
  39. Support for Removing Dams
  40. LID Competition
  41. Finding Promise in Sediment
  42. StormCon 2010 Call for Papers
  43. More Stringent Mining Reviews
  44. Addressing Compost Questions
  45. Im Insulted
  46. Debating the Salt Cedar Beetle
  47. Join Us at StormCon '09 in Anaheim
  48. Tapping Opportunities
  49. Deforestation
  50. The World in a Grain of Sand
  51. Green Jobs Our Jobs
  52. The Price of Perfection
  53. In Default
  54. A Year Later, It's Still Not Over
  55. Teaching Erosion Control
  56. The New Natural
  57. Recognizing Wetlands
  58. The Creek Is Closer Than You Think
  59. Sleight of Plan
  60. Fire Season Planning for What Comes Next
  61. Pulling the Plug on the Great Lakes
  62. Stimulus Money for Flood Control
  63. High-Speed Erosion
  64. StormCon Program Now Online
  65. Of Nutria and Men
  66. Energy versus the Environment
  67. Fire for Soil
  68. Biofuels vs Erosion Prevention
  69. Volunteer Labor
  70. Background Turbidity
  71. More on the Proposed ELG
  72. Debating the Cost of Effluent Limitations Guidelines
  73. Underwater
  74. Private Property, Public Funds
  75. All the Pages, None of the Trees
  76. Lines in the Sand
  77. Take a Look at What We've Added
  78. Cleaning Up in Tennessee
  79. Happy Holidays From Erosion Control
  80. Certification, Anyone
  81. Investing in the Infrastructure
  82. A River Runs Through It
  83. EPA's Proposed Effluent Limitation Guidelines Are Here
  84. Thank You, Firefighters
  85. Restoration Writ Large
  86. Between a Wall and a Hard Place
  87. Another Tool for Restoration
  88. StormCon Abstract Deadline Is Five Weeks Away
  89. A Change to Construction Permitting Not Yet, But Hold On
  90. The LEEDing Edge
  91. The Seed Dilemma
  92. An Overzealous Cleaning
  93. The State of the Infrastructure
  94. StormCon 2009 Call for Papers
  95. Effluent Guidelines for Construction Sites
  96. Assessing Risks After Gustav
  97. Where There Was Smoke, There Will Be Flooding
  98. Looking for Data on BMP Performance
  99. More Than Just the Articles
view all

EC Editor's Blog

February 8th, 2010 1:43pm PST

Putting It All Back

Posted By Janice Kaspersen 1 Comment

A big price tag isn’t unusual for a complex erosion control project, but usually you get something for your money in the end. In Fairbanks, Alaska, the Natural Resources Conservation Service is recommending that a project not simply be stopped, but be completely undone, which could cost as much as $10 million.

The NRCS recommends removing about a mile of a 10-year-old Delta Junction stormwater infiltration basin and associated structures because they haven’t functioned as intended. Originally meant to reduce erosion in the Delta-Clearwater River and the Clearwater Slough, to reduce area flooding, and to improve salmon habitat in the slough, the basin apparently suffered from a poor design. Five years of study of the worsened drainage problems led to the recommendation to return the area to its pre-project condition.

Federal stimulus funds were considered but won’t be available for the restoration effort; the NRCS is looking for other means to pay for it. You can see more details of the project in this article from the Fairbanks Daily News-Miner.

What Do You Think?

Post a Comment

Waterforfish

February 11th, 2010 11:28 AM PT

If the design and/or construction was faulty, why are public funds needed to rectify the situation? Was the original construction a public work or a private work? If this was a private work then the developer, designer and contractor should be held accountable.

Post a Comment

Not a subscriber? Sign Up
 
 
*  
 




 

Get Erosion Control E-mail Updates!

Get weekly news and updates through our Erosion Control e-mail newsletter!