March-April 2006

Streambank Stabilization

Helping streams and channels withstand high-velocity flows.

Article Tools

Create a Link to this Article

By Bill Tice

Comments

Engineers, construction crews, and government employees frequently need to look at ways of rehabilitating streambanks that may be eroding because of increased stream velocity. Sometimes, this increased velocity is caused by manmade changes to the surrounding environment, such as the removal of natural vegetation for construction projects or an overall increase in the amount of impervious surface upstream. In other cases, it is natural events, like a heavy rainfall, that cause the increased velocity and the resulting erosion problems.

PHOTO: ARMORTEC
ACB protects a bank at a wastewater treatment plant.
Rebuilding a Dangerous Embankment
When an empty school bus went off a rural secondary road near Richardsville, KY, in April 2005, staff at the state’s Department of Transportation (DOT) office in nearby Bowling Green took notice. The roadway where the accident occurred was adjacent to a stream called Taylor Branch, and the accident was attributed to shoulder collapse on the roadway, a situation that was caused by severe embankment erosion beginning from the toe of the stream to the top of the bank.

“Fortunately, only the driver was on board at the time of the accident, and he was not injured,” explains John Hepner, a Kentucky DOT bridge inspector for District 3, who headed up the crew that did the stabilization repair work on the streambank. “We were concerned about further shoulder collapses over an area adjacent to the roadway that covered approximately 250 linear feet, so we wanted to make sure we came up with a long-lasting and effective repair method.”

PHOTO: ARMORTEC
Embankment before project began
PHOTO: ARMORTEC
During A-Jacks installation
PHOTO: ARMORTEC
Hand-placing the A-Jacks in matrix
PHOTO: ARMORTEC
Finished Project

The section of embankment adjacent to Taylor Branch, which runs parallel to the road, has an average horizontal width of approximately 4 to 5 feet, while the vertical depth from the top of the roadway surface to the bottom of the creek varied anywhere from 8 to 10 feet. “We think that over time, the stream continually migrated towards the roadway, and that is what started the failure,” adds Hepner, who has been with the Kentucky DOT in the south-central part of the state for 23 years. “Once the erosion reached the loose soil, it just took over from there.”

Hepner says the department looked at a number of possible solutions for stabilizing the streambank, but decided to go with 24-inch A-Jacks concrete units from Armortec in Bowling Green, partly because of how quickly the situation could be corrected with this method and partly because of his past experience with these products. “We really needed to fix this problem quickly, and with the A-Jacks units as a base we could achieve that goal. I have also had previous successful experience with these products, so I know how they are used, and I was confident they would work for us in this situation.”

According to Hepner, a crew of 14 mobilized on September 20, 2005, and completed the job just two-and-a-half days later on September 22. “The A-Jacks units, which look like giant versions of the jacks kids used to play with, come in different sizes. For this job, we went with the 24-inch units, which are the smallest Armortec makes. These make up what essentially becomes the new toe of the embankment, and they are aligned in the streambed along the entire project.”

After the units were placed, Class II channel lining stone from a local quarry was delivered by dump truck and used to backfill the A-Jacks and rebuild the 8 to 10 vertical feet of embankment with a final 2:1 ratio slope. “In addition to the hard armor, we installed a geotextile filter fabric between the stone and the exposed soils throughout the project area,” adds Hepner, who notes that all of the stakeholders are happy with the results. “So far, everyone is pleased with the project. The new streambank has not been challenged by a high-water event as of yet, but we have always been satisfied with how these systems have performed in the past, and I am sure we will be pleased with how they will perform on this application.”

Protection With Concrete Mats
Chris Richard, P.E., needed to protect a $22 million wastewater treatment facility upgrade from potential rising water and erosion from the Vermillion Bayou, a significant body of water that is influenced by rainfall and serves as a recreational and scenic waterway for the citizens of Lafayette, LA. Richard, who is a project manager with Domingue, Szabo & Associates, a civil consulting engineering firm in Lafayette, specified Armortec’s ArmorFlex Class 70 articulating concrete block (ACB) mats as part of the wastewater treatment plant project. Construction on the plant, which is being built by the City of Lafayette, started in June 2005 and is expected to take two years.

 “The City of Lafayette has a very limited site for the wastewater treatment plant upgrade, and the size of the site is constrained by the river, the highway, and other private property,” explains Richard. “We needed to construct a 7-million-gallon equalization basin that goes 15 feet into the ground, and due to the site constrictions, we wanted to build that basin as close to the river as possible. This meant that we had to take measures that would protect the riverbank from erosion, which could be caused by a number of factors, including the construction of the basin, other construction related to the project, and the fact that the project is situated close to a bridge and a bend in the river—two scenarios that can cause increased velocity in the river. We also had to remove a number of trees from the site, so we lost some of the natural protection the area had in the past.”

PHOTO: SUBMAR
A mat system covers exposed pipelines.

By using the ACBs, Richard says his company was able to quickly and cost-effectively protect the site from erosion. “Installing the ACBs on the bank was a small part of the overall project, but it was one of the first things we did.”

Advertisement

The mats stretch 40 feet from the top of the bank into the river and 400 feet in length for a total of 16,000 square feet. Before installation, the bank was graded and a filter cloth was laid in place. The mats were linked together using a cable and the joints between the mats were grouted. The mats were then anchored at the top to prevent movement.

“We were actually lucky that the water level was low when we did the installation, so we were able to install the mats dry, which made it easier,” says Richard. “Once the mats were installed, soil and sediment from the river covered the mats naturally and we covered the anchors and the top sections with soil. This was then hydroseeded and by the fall we had grass growing along the top of the bank.”

Next Page >

What Do You Think?

Post a Comment

Be the first to tell us what you think!

Post a Comment

Not a subscriber? Sign Up
 
 
*  
 




 

Get Erosion Control E-mail Updates!

Get weekly news and updates through our Erosion Control e-mail newsletter!