March-April 2007

Construction-Site Stabilization

Preventing the loss of a landscape

Article Tools

Create a Link to this Article

By Tara Beecham

Comments

Few things can disturb a landscape like the onset of construction. Unlike the neat, finite framework of buildings, sediment is often difficult to work with and control. And this is without even considering the impact a of a strong spring rain pushing sediment into neighboring storm drains or waterways.

Even as the buildings and structures are being secured in the ground, contractors work to keep the ground itself secure from washout and their project protected as they must work within local, state, and federal requirements. On construction sites, meeting the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Phase II requirements is only as easy as selecting the right sediment control solution for each challenging site, both during and after construction.

When Water Is Threatened
The Tampa Bay Water Authority hired Barnard Construction to protect the C.W. Bill Young Regional Reservoir from stormwater runoff pollution for the 1,100-acre site in Lithia, FL, which included sensitive wetland areas. The aboveground reservoir, Florida’s largest reservoir of drinking water, holds more than 15 billion gallons of water essential to area residents.

“For us to build the reservoir, we had to dewater the ground, had to build the embankment,” explains Mike Fuller, project superintendent at Bozeman, MT–based Barnard Construction, the contractor for the project.

When the vegetation had been removed around the site, it was discovered that the soil was natural clay.       

“Once the water came across the site, we had turbid water,” says Fuller. “We used Ciba [Specialty Chemicals Corp.]’s Magnafloc to coagulate the solids out of the water.”

Photo: Ciba Specialty Chemicals
Floc bags helped coagulate solids out of the water at a Florida aboveground reservoir.
Photo: Ciba Specialty Chemicals
A mixing area during the first phase of a project

Maximum turbidity concentrations were limited to 36 nephelometric turbidity units in the water leaving the site.

“We had the site graded all at once,” notes Fuller. “We used sod for the main erosion protection. We had silt fence—280,000 feet of silt fence—across the entire site, but silt fence isn’t going to stop turbid water. We used the Ciba.”

The stormwater treatment plan implementation took place from about October 2002 until August 2003. Site inspections were performed daily. Workers had not anticipated the multiple rain events that dominated what was supposed to be the area’s dry season. The flow of stormwater was as much as 6,000 gallons per minute, according to Naresh Kanderi of Suffolk, VA–based Ciba Specialty Chemicals.

“We couldn’t have built the site without getting rid of the water. To get rid of the water, we had to chemically treat it,” says Fuller. “Typical BMPs wouldn’t work.”

Sodding, swales, and ponds were some of the post-construction measures the company took to control sediment and erosion in the area.

Protection often extends beyond the construction site itself, as when a site borders sensitive wetlands.

Advertisement

A massive construction project can mean facing an increased risk of losing large amounts of sediment but only if the proper precautions aren’t taken. Silt fence is one way project planners can help stabilize a site’s land while construction continues.

“We recently installed a 10,000-linear-foot project for Alessio Brothers Excavating out of Rockdale, Illinois,” says Al Kuda, president of AAA Silt Fencing based in Lemont, IL. “The project was on Diehl Road and Freedom Drive in Lisle, Illinois. We plowed the entire perimeter as well as a double row in front of the wetlands and other key areas of concern.” Next Page >

What Do You Think?

Post a Comment

Be the first to tell us what you think!

Post a Comment

Not a subscriber? Sign Up
 
 
*  
 




 

Get Erosion Control E-mail Updates!

Get weekly news and updates through our Erosion Control e-mail newsletter!