March-April 2009

Different Approaches, Same Outcome

With the benefit of experience, contractors have developed effective methods for ESC on construction sites.

Article Tools

Create a Link to this Article

Photo: East Bay Construction

Additional Article Content

By Don Talend

Comments

To say the least, no one-size-fits-all erosion and sediment control solution for construction sites exists. Since 2003, when Phase II of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) took effect, the task of controlling erosion and sedimentation has become more of a challenge because contractors have had to formulate a plan, even for construction sites from 1 to 5 acres. NPDES permits require the inclusion of a stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) specifying what measures will be used. Because SWPPPs often rely on the use of best management practices (BMPs) that are accepted at the state level, several contractors indicate that there is room for ingenuity.

A wide array of tools and methods are available to contractors who face an increasingly strict atmosphere as SWPPPs are enforced under the watchful eye of regulators whose sophistication is growing. Three contractors share with Erosion Control the various tools and methods they use in their different geographic areas.

Recommending Improvements
Brian Tillman, director of environmental services for East Bay Construction in Livermore, CA, says that the local regulatory atmosphere allows him plenty of opportunity to apply ingenuity to the SWPPPs under which the company controls erosion and sedimentation. A landscaping company employing more than 300 people that expanded into erosion control services and brought in Tillman to head up its erosion control division five years ago, East Bay has recently opened an office in southern California and gotten heavily involved in public works projects as the housing market in California has slowed down. “Probably 95% of our work is public works jobs,” he says, adding that about 80% of the company’s projects were in the residential sector for many years. Tillman argues that he has some tools and techniques that are of benefit to local regulators who sometimes specify antiquated ones in SWPPPs.

Photo: Complete General
A silt fence installer mounted on a four-wheel-drive tractor was used to install a long silt fence in northwest Ohio.
“The people doing the SWPPPs—the items that they’re using are so outdated that you might have seen them on a plan 20 years ago,” he says. “I would say that maybe 90% of people who make the SWPPPs are using the same specs—they’re not keeping up with the times. There are so many products out there you can use that are cheaper for the customer and also a better BMP.”

An example of an outdated specified method, Tillman says, is the use of asphalt emulsion as a tackifier for straw on hydroseeded slopes. “You still get specs where they still want to put asphalt emulsion on top,” he says. “There are so many more tacking agents out there.”

That is not to suggest that enforcement of SWPPPs is lax in East Bay’s geographic market. “In northern California, the inspectors are definitely paying attention to what’s going on,” says Tillman. Elsewhere, he says, “you don’t have the enforcement that you have in northern California or even southern California. I understand that southern California’s really stepped up its efforts in the past two or three years.”

Advertisement

Experience serves as a valuable mentor when Tillman recommends a performance-based alteration to a SWPPP. “For most of the jobs I do in the private sector, I make suggestions and I’ll clarify them in my bid,” he says, adding that he often recommends specific alternative methods to a specified BMP. An admittedly extreme recent case of recommending changes to the SWPPP was on a hydroseeding project in the North Bay area, in which the plan called for the injection of asphalt emulsion into straw as it was being dispersed through a blower. “We know what asphalt emulsion is; we don’t think that’s adequate to be put in the environment,” Tillman says. “That’s a spec that’s at least 20 years old. That’s what’s in the spec instead of using a guar-style [tackifier] or Plantego-style tack.”

On the recent North Bay area project, East Bay used what Tillman describes as the company’s “triple step” for hydroseeding and tacking. “You apply seed, but basically [the] hydroseed won’t stand by itself under rainy conditions because you’re not using a [bonded fiber] matrix or HydroStraw,” he explains. “You blow straw on top of it and then blow it down with paper mulch and some type of binder. Basically, that takes the impact of the rain, so your hydroseed underneath will stay, and it creates a compost blanket on top. We don’t use [asphalt emulsion]; we use Plantego or guar. I suggested my own spec, and that’s the way I submitted it.” Next Page >

What Do You Think?

Post a Comment

Be the first to tell us what you think!

Post a Comment

Not a subscriber? Sign Up
 
 
*  
 




 

Get Erosion Control E-mail Updates!

Get weekly news and updates through our Erosion Control e-mail newsletter!