May 2007

Preventing Bank Erosion

Retaining walls and bulkheads save creeks and lakeshores.

Article Tools

Create a Link to this Article

By Janis Keating

Comments


According to Ballerini, the geotextile lining placed behind the wall is generally specified by the manufacturer. The lining’s purpose is to prevent soil from infiltrating the gravel layer directly behind the wall. Not only must the soil be contained, but also its type is very important in terms of the design; soil conditions determine what footings and anchors will be utilized.

Accounting for potential flow and volume increases is not a large concern in small waterways. “Most clients are private property owners who want an economical solution,” Ballerini says. “We examine upstream and downstream effects, but generally more qualitative than quantitative. We ask the question and may apply a factor of safety if applicable.”

Photo: CMI
Vertical walls are appealing because they allow for yard use to the shore.
Photo: CMI

There are cost differences between soft armor (vegetation in combination with various geosynthetic linings) and hard armor (such as retaining walls), but in some instances, soft armor is not a viable option. “Soft solutions can be considerably cheaper, but in urban settings they can be ineffective in areas of the creek that will experience high flows. Plantings are cost-effective in the short run, but if we plant them in spring or summer they don’t have enough time to develop good root systems before the storms come. You may have to replace plants, so the costs increase. On the other hand, with hard armor, even if you have to start late in the season, it goes up fast, and the problem is solved.”

Advertisement

Matterhorn’s experience gives it an edge over many contractors. “Civil engineers are shying away from creek bank repair,” Ballerini explains. “The work is very labor intensive, it has a large number of variables, and it does not fit into our risk-versus-reward equation. The advantage of using a Matterhorn product is that it is design-built, and the contractor is better positioned to deal with the risk associated with these types of projects. Matterhorn projects have stood the test of time. We have used them on many projects without a single failure and no evidence of adverse upstream or downstream effects.”

Scaling Mountains of Paperwork for Clients
Matterhorn’s Phil Zeidman further explains his company’s position. “We end up handling all the details for the client. If they’re contacted by, or contact, the local flood control district, they turn it over to us—we do all the permitting and drawings. Civil Engineer Brian Ballerini also sometimes does drawings for us. Next Page >

What Do You Think?

Post a Comment

Be the first to tell us what you think!

Post a Comment

Not a subscriber? Sign Up
 
 
*  
 




 

Get Erosion Control E-mail Updates!

Get weekly news and updates through our Erosion Control e-mail newsletter!