September-October 2007

Choices in Dust Control

Stabilizing seaports, airports, and dusty roads

Article Tools

Create a Link to this Article

By Mary Ellen Hare

Comments


Previous to this application, the “laydown yards” at the port were unpaved and unstabilized. In addition to truck traffic, they were subject to heavy loads: forklifts weighing over 50,000 pounds as well as rolls of steel and pipe, Hoffman says. “All this leads to potholes, which lead to dust. It’s a remedy to reduce particulate matter.”

Falkenberg notes that work on the project had to be done between 4:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. because of the volume of traffic passing through the site. “Some single-acre sites, or laydown yards, receive over 200 tractor-trailers a day,” he says, adding that these vehicles typically weigh 80,000 pounds.

Hoffman says this work is not typical of what he generally does; he is still primarily a civil contractor. “But the calls [about dust control] are increasing. And when the calls increase, the jobs increase.”

Dust Control at Airports
On March 15, 2007, the EPA issued a press release saying that the Phoenix area had failed to meet the federal clean-air standard for coarse particulate matter (PM10), or dust, by the December 31, 2006, deadline: “The primary causes of dust pollution in the Phoenix area are from windblown dust from construction sites, road building activities, agricultural fields, unpaved parking lots and roads, disturbed vacant lots and paved road dust.”

Photo: Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport
Airports are always at the forefront of dust control.

Although airports were not mentioned specifically, as the superintendent of building Services at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport, Joseph Husband has been doing his part to comply with regulations. He has been involved in maintenance activities at Phoenix Sky Harbor, Deer Valley, and Goodyear airports for more than 16 years. He previously managed the airfield maintenance function for the Phoenix Airport System and is first vice president of the Arizona Airports Association.

“We typically deal with dust maintenance applications as opposed to construction dust control,” Husband says. “During maintenance activities, we do practice dust control measures such as gravel pads, watering, and palliative application.”

Husband says airports have always been at the forefront of dust control due to their unique problem of maintaining visibility ranges that can be compromised by windblown dust or dust rising from jet blast and propeller wash from aircraft. “This is particularly important in the approach and departure areas at the runway ends and also in the unpaved areas immediately adjacent to the runways and taxiways that can be affected by turning aircraft and outboard engine placement.”

To reduce dust, the City of Phoenix Aviation Department Airport System uses all of the common procedures, such as vegetation, soil stabilization, ground cover, and topical treatments. The latter has become the preferred treatment, according to Husband, due to “effectiveness, relative low cost, long service life, and fast application rates.

“We currently use a polymer product,” Husband says. “Our current contract provider isEarthCare Consultants, and the specified product under our contract is Soil-Sement. The product is typically sprayed topically by a distributor truck at one of two specified solution strengths and application rates. An additional option under our contract is that the Soil-Sement is blended with soil and compacted for more permanent stabilization of soil, which provides long-lasting durable surface. Both application techniques result in a soil surface free of dust emissions for 12 to 36 months or more, depending on environmental conditions and frequency of travel over the treated area.”

Advertisement

The City of Phoenix, like any other municipality governing airports, has the goal of achieving acceptably low levels of particulate matter and staying out of the non-attainment category under the federal Clean Air Act. Among the methods used to determine effectiveness in reducing fugitive-dust emissions, Husband listed visual observation of dust activity near aircraft movement areas or on unpaved areas subject to service vehicle traffic; visual observation of air opacity in and around airport areas; lab analysis of treated soil areas; and ball-bearing drop testing. “This is a procedure in which a ball bearing is dropped from approximately 12 inches onto bare soil areas and then an observation is made as to whether a puff of dust occurs at the point and time of impact,” he explains. “This is an unscientific test to determine if soil areas have a ‘crust’ that reduces or eliminates dust emissions.”

Ultimately, the City of Phoenix Airport System is looking for long-term solutions to its dust problem. “We are turning to paving of infields with asphalt as a permanent method to control dust and vegetation,” Husband says. “This method is expensive initially and does require some level of pavement maintenance, but the long-term costs and reduced maintenance activity pay dividends to the airport.” Next Page >

What Do You Think?

Post a Comment

Be the first to tell us what you think!

Post a Comment

Not a subscriber? Sign Up
 
 
*  
 




 

Get Erosion Control E-mail Updates!

Get weekly news and updates through our Erosion Control e-mail newsletter!